DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NR7198-14
2 Mar 15
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: §§§ Secretary of the Navy
EO
Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HOMC memo 1070 MIQ of 14 Jan 15
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
' to adjust proficiency and conduct marks.
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 March
2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
. a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies ‘available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
.Warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
- action.
Docket No. NR7198-14
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. The MCTFS Record of Service transfer marks executed on 2
March 2012 are Pro/Con 4.2/4.2 vice Pro/Con 4.2/2.2.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4, It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's" review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board's proceedings in the above entitled
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the f
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
2 Mar 15
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06547-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by assigning proficiency/conduct (*PRO”/”CON”) marks for 31 July 2007 and raising or removing the marks for 31 January and 14 July 2008. That office specifically recommended replacing the marks to be removed with “not applicable” (“NA”) and accomplishing a “delete as erroneous” unit...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03056-02
find what marks Petitioner should In view of the above, the Board directs the “N/A/N/A, ” and RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, by changing his “2.9/2.9 ” to “N/A/N/A ”; and that his profiadiencyiconduct marks of 7 October 1959 from final marks of 19 December 1959 be changed accordingly: conduct from proficiency from “4.3” to “4.6.” “4.4” to “4.5” and b. as assigned PRO/CON marks of Aug59 to 70ct59 by his commanding b. The Board for Correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06805-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the ' proficiency/conduct (“Ppro” /"CON”) marks of “1,5"/"1.5" dated 3 July 2007, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Petitioner exhausted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00506-08
On 22 June 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted his request for service connection for a condition of his right shoulder which it rated at 10% from 4 January 2006. d. On 10 September 2007, the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED) advised the Commanding General, Marine Reserve Forces, that Petitioner was not physically qualified for retention in the USMCR due to lupus. In the Director’s opinion, the available evidence is insufficient to warrant recommending...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00626-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 626-05 24 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Shortly after the conviction by SPCM, on 31 July 1960, Petitioner received adverse marks of 1.0 and 3.4 in conduct and proficiency, respectively. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08411 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by showing that on 18 July 1986, he was issued an honorable characterization of service vice the other than honorable (OTH) discharge of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 18 July 1986, he was issued an honorable characterization of service vice the OTH...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00824-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 20 March attached. reason other than a court-martial or nonjudicial punishment by a page 11 entry for assignment of conduct marks below 4.0; paragraph assignment of proficiency marks below 3.0.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02036-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reinstatement in the Aircrew Rescue Swimmer program, with an Enlistment Bonus (EB) of $15,000 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00878-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer-3 (CWO-3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 CWO-3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2001 CWO-3 Selection Board. &rt in Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5548 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 16 January, 19 Pebruary,,amd-18 March 2003 (copies at Tab A). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 16 January and 19...